Today we practised using coin shaped shapes how to do different timings and spacing to make the animation appear faster or slower. For this coin, it is evenly spread and close together to create a nice even line which is going at a consistent speed. Whereas this one has a faster speed compared to the first even tho they both start and finish at the same time. This is because the spacing of the two is different. in the first one, each frame is placed evenly and consistently, so there are no gaps between each frame. Whereas the second one has fewer frames in the centre, which makes it appear faster, even tho they have the same number of frames and start and finish at the same time. This allows me to see the difference between timing and spacing, and what I can do with it. The same can be said for the next two pendulums. Both start and finish at the same time and yet have different speeds. This is all due to the spacing of each frame. ...
Hey Grace,
ReplyDeleteOkay - so first things first: hyperrealism is a complex theory and you'll need to demonstrate you understand it and can give it away to the reader effectively. I have a warning for you too: hyperrealism aligns with two things: the way things look and 'the way things are'. When Baudrillard talks about hyperreality he is essentially criticising something; for him, hyperrealism is tragic and totally inauthentic; he argues that we're living in these 'fake worlds' created for us by advertising, by mass media, and so on. For Baudrillard, 'hyperrealism' is something to be resisted and challenged.
It's true that the production design of those Scissorhands suburbs 'look' hyperealistic (like something created out of a magazine photoshoot), but I guess the really interesting thing about that is 'why?' What is the conceptual relationship between the way those houses look (hyper-real) and Baudrillard's ideas on 'Hyperrealism'? What has Hyperrealism got to do with the themes of the film itself? I'd argue that Edward Scissorhands is a BIG criticism of the American Dream; of consumerism; of celebrity; of commodification: it's a film that collides 'fakeness' with 'authenticity'...
When I look at your structure, I suppose I'm a bit worried that you might end up just repeating the same observation which is 'The sets and costumes of Edward Scissorhands are hyperreal'... okay, agreed - but so what?
It's this 'so what?' that is key to your structure: so this is what I want you to think about: What is Baudrillard's critique and how does that critique relate to the themes of Edward Scissorhands? Answer that question and your observations about the design of the film etc will be proving a point/making an argument, as opposed to just being 'descriptive' of what's on screen.